Abusing Science--The Case against Creationism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):85-89 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism.Michael Ruse - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):348-354.
Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism.Michael Ruse - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.
Review of Philip Kitcher: Abusing Science—The Case against Creationism[REVIEW]Harmke Kamminga - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):85-89.
Abusing Science. [REVIEW]Charles F. Kielkopf - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (1):110-118.
Tiede yhteiskunnassa.Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Tiede and Edistys 1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
1 (#1,900,947)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Kitcher
Columbia University

Citations of this work

Model Pluralism.Walter Veit - 2019 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (2):91-114.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem.Maarten Boudry - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):83-101.

View all 104 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references