Reasons: A digital argument mapping library for modern browsers

, , &
Journal of Open Source Software 4 (37):1044 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reasons.js is an open-source, loosely-coupled, web-based argument mapping library that can be integrated into a range of online coursewares and websites. The javascript library can be embedded into any HTML page and allows users to create, edit, share, and export argument maps . The API is designed to permit the integration of the three stages of informal logical analysis — identification of truth claims within arguments, the analysis of logical structure, and synthesis of logical structure into written form

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.21105/joss.01044

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Using Computer-Assisted Argument Mapping to Teach Reasoning to Students.Martin Davies, Ashley Barnett & Tim van Gelder - 2021 - In J. Anthony Blair (ed.), The Critical Thinking Anthology. pp. 115-152.
Biblioteca Napoletana Digitale.Mazzola Roberto & Cerino Ruggero - 2016 - Laboratorio dell’ISPF 13.
Argument maps improve critical thinking.Charles Twardy - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116.
Mapping Dante: A Digital Platform for the Study of Places in the Commedia.Andrea Gazzoni - 2017 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 5 (1):82-95.
Geospatial Visualizations for the Study of Boccaccio.Michael Papio - 2017 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 5 (1):24-45.
Concept mapping, mind mapping argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?W. Martin Davies - 2011 - Higher Education 62 (3):279–301.
Scholarly Networks and Collaborative Practices.Massimo Riva - 2017 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 5 (1):5-11.
’What? So what?’: The next-generation JHOVE2 architecture for format-aware characterization.Abrams Stephen, Morrissey Sheila & Cramer Tom - unknown
Defining web ethics.Marsha Woodbury - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):203-212.
Capturing Citizens’ Values: On the Role of Narratives and Emotions in Digital Participation.Katharina Esau - 2018 - Analyse & Kritik 40 (1):55-72.
The effectiveness of a single intervention of computer-aided argument mapping in a marketing and a financial accounting subject.Martin Davies - 2011 - Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3):387-403.
Public reasons and the 'private language' argument.Richard J. Norman - unknown
Critical Thinking in the Intelligence Community: The Promise of Argument Mapping.Lawrence A. Lengbeyer - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (2):14-34.
A library is not the books: an ethical obstacle to the digital library.James M. Donovan - 2012 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 10 (2):93-106.
Handout #3: Moral motivation and externalism.David O. Brink - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-29

Downloads
60 (#263,766)

6 months
9 (#294,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Dave Kinkead
University of Queensland
Deborah Brown
University of Queensland
Peter Ellerton
University of Queensland
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Argument maps improve critical thinking.Charles Twardy - 2004 - Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116.
Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking.Jennifer Wilson Mulnix - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
What is a good argument?Trudy Govier - 1992 - Metaphilosophy 23 (4):393-409.

Add more references