Abstract

The canonical Buddhist manuscripts often convey not only diverse but also contradictory message when considered individually. Wo˘nhyo, in his extensive commentaries on these works, made use of an approach which served to unify them, thus rendering the reader a more consistent understanding of their meaning. This approach, which may be called an "all-comprehensive interpretation," employs certain aspects of the traditional Buddhist perspective with regard to language and also embraces the Taoist notion of ontology. ;This dissertation has developed a new philosophical understanding of the manuscripts from which Wo˘nhyo's thought is derived. The Buddhist view on language as described in Early Buddhist scriptures is discussed first. Its liberal and rational approach toward language is explored, and is compared to its transcendental aspect, which considers language as incapable of delineating the truth. A study of the concept of upaya in the Lotus Sutra, and Wo˘nhyo's debt to this sutra is then discussed. The Lotus Sutra represents the first major Mahayana Buddhist effort to harmonize the various interpretations of Buddhism. Wo˘nhyo himself wrote an essay which investigates this sutra. On the other hand, Madhyamika's contribution to Wo˘nhyo's philosophy is also addressed. Madhyamika Buddhism, utilizing its unique four-cornered logic, rigorously criticized adherence to any one particular doctrine, and with its unique two-truths system provided a systematic philosophy centering on the understanding of the relationship between language and the truth. Lastly, it is shown that the Taoist tradition during the Wei-Ch'in era also contributed to Wo˘nhyo's understanding of Buddhism; this aspect has virtually never been previously investigated. Wo˘nhyo developed the non-duality of the two-truths in Madhyamika into the non-duality of chen-su, which represents the denial of all discrimination among things in the phenomenal world as well as the denial of any distinction between the phenomenal and noumenal worlds. This radical non-duality is presented as deriving from his adaptation of Taoist concepts as the basis for his all-comprehensive interpretation of Buddhism