Master and Slave: the Dialectic of Human-Artificial Intelligence Engagement

Humanistic Management Journal 6 (3):355-371 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The massive introduction of artificial intelligence has triggered significant societal concerns, ranging from “technological unemployment” and the dominance of algorithms in the work place and in everyday life, among others. While AI is made by humans and is, therefore, dependent on the latter for its purpose, the increasing capabilities of AI to carry out productive activities for humans can lead the latter to unwitting slavish existence. This has become evident, for example, in the area of social media use, where AI programmers tie psychology and persuasion to the human social need for approval and validation in ways that few users can resist. We argue that AI should serve humans with humans as masters and not the other way around. Moreover, we propose that virtue ethics might play a role to solidify the human as master of AI and guard against the alternative of AI as the master.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-04

Downloads
20 (#793,209)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tae Wan Kim
Carnegie Mellon University