"Anselm's Principle" in Hartshorne's Modal Argument

Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 25 (1) (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.46992/pijp.25.1.a.4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]G. Oppy - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):690-693.
Anselm's neglected argument.Brian Leftow - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Anselm's Argument: Divine Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2022 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The modal ontological argument.R. Kane - 1984 - Mind 93 (371):336-350.
Hartshorne and Findlay on ‘Necessity’ in the Ontological Argument.W. Gregory Lycan - 1968 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 17:132-141.
Hartshorne's Presupposition.Wayne A. Lenhardt - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):345 - 349.
Mechanized analysis of Anselm’s modal ontological argument.John Rushby - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (2):135-152.
The Ontological Argument.Stephen Makin - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (243):83 - 91.
The "Second Version" of Anselm's Ontological Argument.R. Robert Basham - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):665 - 683.
The Modal Unity of Anselm’s Proslogion.Gary Mar - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):50-67.
The logic of perfection.Charles Hartshorne - 1962 - LaSalle, Ill.,: Open Court Pub. Co..
Anselm's Ontological Argument: Its Meaning and Significance.Robert Brecher - 1977 - Dissertation, University of Kent
Is Existence a Predicate in Anselm's Argument?: DAVID M. LOCHHEAD.David M. Lochhead - 1966 - Religious Studies 2 (1):121-127.
Anselm's other argument.A. D. Smith - 2014 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
What does the second form of the ontological argument prove?H. Jong Kim - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):17 - 40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-08

Downloads
11 (#1,132,055)

6 months
11 (#232,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Kimble
National Chung Cheng University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references