The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander

Philosophy 69 (268):231-233 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100046878

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Rediscovery of Tense: A Reply to Oaklander.J. D. Kiernan-Lewis - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (268):231 - 233.
A note on Chisholm on tense.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (2):283 - 285.
Unrestricted Quantification and Reality: Reply to Kim. [REVIEW]Takashi Yagisawa - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (1):77-79.
‘Now’ and ‘Then’ in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
A. N. prior's rediscovery of tense logic.Peter Øhrstrøm & Per Hasle - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (1):23 - 50.
Freedom and the new theory of time.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1998 - In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. Oxford University Press. pp. 185-205.
A reply to Schlesinger.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (138):93-94.
Resemblances and universals: A reply to J. Nammour.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1975 - Mind 84 (335):436-439.
A reply to Oaklander.Richard M. Gale - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig.L. Nathan Oaklander - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):156-163.
Review: Peter Ohrstrom, Per Hasle, A. N. Prior's Rediscovery of Tense Logic. [REVIEW]Nino Cocchiarella - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):347-348.
Some Reasons for the Rediscovery and Appreciation of Mendel's Work in the First Years of the Present Century.J. S. Wilkie - 1962 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (1):5-17.
The New Theory of Time.L. Nathan Oaklander & Quentin Smith (eds.) - 1994 - Yale Up.
McTaggart’s Paradox and the Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Time, Tense, and Quantifiers: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification.Christian Rohrer - 1980 - ISSN.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
1 (#1,893,477)

6 months
1 (#1,498,742)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thank Goodness It's over.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (260):256 - 258.

Add more references