Reuse of Text in P?li Legal Commentaries

Buddhist Studies Review 33 (1-2):8-45 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We will examine three types of reuse represented in P?li legal literature: unacknowledged borrowings of authoritative opinions and definitions adapted and rearranged ; unacknowledged borrowings of largely unchanged selected text portions being rearranged ; and unconnected extracts of unchanged text portions lined up in the sequence of the source text century CE).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Elisa Freschi & Cathy Cantwell - 2017 - Buddhist Studies Review 33 (1-2):1-7.
A long chain of P-points.Borisa Kuzeljevic & Dilip Raghavan - 2018 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 18 (1):1850004.
Note on the Term Therav?da.Bhikkhu Analayo - 2014 - Buddhist Studies Review 30 (2):215-235.
The Role of Genres and Text Selection in Legal Translator Training.Dorka Balogh - 2019 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 58 (1):17-34.
Yaśodharā in Jātakas.Sarah Shaw - 2018 - Buddhist Studies Review 35 (1-2):261-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-26

Downloads
15 (#976,359)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references