Criteria for Replication of Psychological Knowledge in the Context of the Cultural-Historical Epistemology

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (2):51-58 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author considers some methodological problems of contemporary psychological research in the context of the concept of cultural-historical epistemology, as it is represented in the paper by B.I. Pruzhinin and T.G. Shchedrina. The author claims that the key problem of the modern science lies not in the question of how to conduct research correctly, but how to express the results so that another scientist can reproduce them. What are the criteria for their validity and reliability? With this problem in the background, it becomes obvious that there is a fundamental gap between the theoretical and methodological part of a particular study and the description of the selection and methods, the organizing procedure for empirical research, and the analysis of the results. Scientists’ attention is focused on the development and implementation of empirical research, while the actual production and reproduction of knowledge happen to be outside the scope of solving research problems. In the latter case, we mean the entire procedure for the reproduction of knowledge, including the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the novelty and relevance of the research, the empirical part of the scientific work itself, and, of course, the cultural-historical interpretation of the results, or, more correctly, their reasonable explanation. The problem of psychological knowledge replication is considered in the article. Also, the criteria for the replication of knowledge at various points of scientific and psychological research are discussed, in particular – the criteria of constancy and renewal of knowledge in experimental situations, which presuppose the conceptual setting of the studied phenomena, and of the facts’ correlation from different experiments. Considerable attention is paid to the specific object field of psychological science and, thereby, to the analysis of such scientific procedures as description, interpretation and explanation. Especially, the methodological arguments are analyzed which make it possible to introduce the procedure for explaining scientific data into the criteria system for the replication of psychic phenomena.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and Reality in the Historical Epistemology.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):6-19.
Why Replication is Overrated.Uljana Feest - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):895-905.
The role of replication in psychological science.Samuel C. Fletcher - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-19.
Epistemology according to Allamah Tabatabai.Alamulhuda Rizvi Sejed Murtaza - 2020 - Kom: Časopis Za Religijske Nauke 9 (1):27-50.
Common Sense and A Priori Epistemology.Noah M. Lemos - 1998 - The Monist 81 (3):473-487.
Persons and Substances.Scott Campbell - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 104 (3):253-267.
Historical epistemology: necessary complications.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):52-55.
Historical epistemology.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):20-28.
What Is a Replication?Edouard Machery - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):545-567.
Historical epistemology and the fate of theory of knowledge in philosophy.Zinaida Sokuler - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):29-33.
Production of knowledge about the knowledge.Olga Koshovets - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):40-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-30

Downloads
1 (#1,901,542)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references