Historical epistemology: necessary complications

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):52-55 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper sums up the discussion on historical epistemology, pointing on it's ambivalence as singled out place in intellectual field and as some project, that should be assembled. Based on remarks of the discussion participants, we make an assumption, that historical epistemology is a specific zone of maneuvers and interchanges between philosophy and empirical studies of knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the possibility of “negotiations” in historical epistemology.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):52-55.
Why so complicated?Tatiana Sokolova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):47-51.
Contra relativism.Taras Varkhotov - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):33-38.
Historical epistemology.Alexander Pisarev - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):34-39.
Historical epistemology.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):20-28.
Knowledge and Reality in the Historical Epistemology.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):6-19.
Historical epistemology and the fate of theory of knowledge in philosophy.Zinaida Sokuler - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):29-33.
Historical Epistemology Meets the Human Sciences.Tomáš Dvořák & Jan Balon - 2011 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 33 (1):5-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
8 (#1,333,265)

6 months
1 (#1,721,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references