Three Philosophical Moralists: Mill, Kant and Sartre. An Introduction to Ethics

Philosophical Quarterly 41 (162):116-117 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2219800

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Three philosophical moralists: Mill, Kant, and Sartre:an introduction to ethics.George C. Kerner - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Three Philosophical Moralists: Mill, Kant and Sartre. An Introduction to Ethics.Eric Matthews - 1991 - Philosophical Books 32 (2):116-117.
Three philosophical moralists : Mill, Kant and Sartre.George C. Kerner - 1991 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 181 (3):351-351.
Philosophical Ethics: An Historical And Contemporary Introduction.Stephen Darwall - 1997 - Westview Press.
Trei teorii etice. Kant, Mill, Hare.Valentin Muresan - 2012 - Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.
Kant and Sartre: re-discovering critical ethics.Sorin Baiasu - 2011 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sartre's Criticisms of Kant's Moral Philosophy.Gail Linsenbard - 2007 - Sartre Studies International 13:65-85.
Sartre on Kant in The Transcendence of the Ego.Liu Zhe - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (1):67-76.
Kant and Sartre: Existentialism and Critical Philosophy.Jonathan Head, Anna Tomaschewska, Jochen Bojanowski, Alberto Vanzo & Sorin Baiasu - 2016 - In Sorin Baiasu (ed.), Comparing Kant and Sartre. Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 3-17.
Sartre on Kant in The Transcendence of the Ego.Liu Zhe - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (1):67-76.
Negativistic Ethics in Sartre.Patrick Engel - 2013 - Sartre Studies International 19 (1):16-34.
Eight theories of ethics.Gordon Graham - 2004 - New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
J.S. Mill.Henry R. West - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Many students of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics recognize the value of comparisons between Aristotle and modern moralists. We are familiar with some of the ways in which reflection on Hume, Kant, Mill, Sidgwick, and more recent moral theorists can throw light on Aristotle. The light may come either from recognition of similarities or from a sharper awareness of differences.“Themes ancient and modern” is a familiar part of the contemporary study of Aristotle that needs no further commendation. [REVIEW]Natural Law Aquinas & Aristotelian Eudaimonism - 2006 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell.
Why be good?: a historical introduction to ethics.Duncan Richter - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
17 (#860,469)

6 months
5 (#629,992)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Gorman
Queen's University, Belfast

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references