Comments on Paul Horwich's "On the Alleged Normative Import of Implicit Definitions" (Workshop Implicit Definitions and A Priori Knowledge, GAP 6, Berlin, September 2006) [Book Review]

Abstract

Let R be an epistemic rule of the simplest type: "Accept sentence s!" Assume that R is a basic rule we actually follow: Our accepting the sentence cannot be explained by our following more fundamental rules of sentence-acceptance. Assume furthermore that we feel rationally obliged to follow R; that is, we all agree on the correctness of the epistemic norm N which says: We ought to accept s.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
15 (#975,816)

6 months
1 (#1,516,021)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Kemmerling
Universität Heidelberg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references