Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe

Argumentation 23 (2):239-257 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The pragmatics underlying Paul Grice’s analysis of utterance-meaning provide a powerful framework for investigating the commitments arguers undertake. Unfortunately, the complexity of Grice’s analysis has frustrated appropriate reliance on this important facet of his work. By explicating Cicero’s use of apostrophe in his famous “First Catilinarian” this essay attempts to show that a full complex of reflexive gricean speaker intentions in essentially to seriously saying and meaning something

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
43 (#369,055)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Kauffeld
Edgewood College

Citations of this work

The Persuasive Force of Demanding.Beth Innocenti & Nichole Kathol - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (1):50-72.
A normative pragmatic model of making fear appeals.Beth Innocenti - 2011 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):273-290.
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions.Beth Innocenti - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):345-364.

Add more citations