Philosophy of Science in Russia

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):6-17 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article shows that Russian philosophical community is very sensitive towards the history and the current state of philosophy of science and of science studies, which are a subject matter of special interest by virtue of a dedicated space in the university education system. This status is also supported by its proximity to the international philosophical mainstream of the 20th century and its specific object, its connection with science. Philosophy of science at the same time retains some neutrality in relation to the dominant political ideology and proposes claims for an objective knowledge. History of philosophy of science, therefore, serves largely as a history of philosophical rationalism, and its prospects are determined by the strengthening of the role of science in modern culture. However, the modern existence of philosophy of science is undergoing substantial change and experiences a series of challenges. Among them there are the humiliation of intellectuals and scientists in society political voluntarism, mass consumption and the cult of mysticism. Under these conditions, a philosophical study of science and technology is forced to take on the challenges of social criticism and shape special civil institutions for self-preservation. Thus philosophy of science integrates the political, ethical and even social engineering components that allow for treating it as a hard core of interdisciplinary interaction of all socio-humanitarian disciplines.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Sciencein Russia.И.Т Касавин & В.Н Порус - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):6-17.
What, If Anything, is the Philosophy of Political Science?Gianluca Pozzoni - 2021 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51 (3):289-311.
How Is Political Philosophy of Science Possible?Ilya Kasavin - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 45 (3):5-15.
Turning Back to Kuhn.Ilya T. Kasavin & Vladimir N. Porus - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):6-19.
On Some Prospects of the Russian Philosophy of Natural Sciences.Boris I. Pruzhinin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):107-111.
The Geometry of Knowledge: Lewis, Becker, Carnap and the Formalization of Philosophy in the 1920s.Alan Richardson - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):165-182.
Trading zones as a subject-matter of social philosophy of science.Ilya Kasavin - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):8-17.
What Has History of Science to Do with History of Philosophy?Tad M. Schmaltz - 2013 - In Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-11

Downloads
3 (#1,213,485)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Science as not a Set of Results but the Way of Obtaining Them.Lyudmila A. Markova - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (11):96-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references