Turning Back to Kuhn

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):6-19 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article examines the problem of interpreting normal and revolutionary science in the concept of Thomas Kuhn. It is shown that the “normal science” is the central concept of the Kuhn’s history of science, designed in accordance with the normative definition of science adopted by him. Such a story serves an internal purpose – to justify the special epistemical status of expert knowledge. But there is also an external goal – to establish professional science as an institution with special epistemological status and social function, which is situated in a center of intellectual power and property. Historians are those who are forced to constantly rewrite history – either following the methodology of “rational reconstruction” or responding to the challenges of their time. To be a “conservative” or a “revolutionary” in the history of science is a choice made not only for philosophical reasons, but also under the influence of the general socio-cultural situation of the epoch.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kuhn and the History of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2019 - In M. Fricker, N. J. L. L. Pedersen, D. Henderson & P. J. Graham (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 40-48.
Kuhn Meets Maslow: The Psychology Behind Scientific Revolutions.Boris Kožnjak - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (2):257-287.
Normal science and the extension of theories.Jack C. Carloye - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):241-256.
How Is Post-Normal Science Possible?Lada V. Shipovalova - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (3):61-73.
Philosophy of Sciencein Russia.И.Т Касавин & В.Н Порус - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):6-17.
Philosophy of Science in Russia.Ilya Kasavin & Vladimir Porus - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):6-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-16

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references