Jumping to Conclusions in Criminal Law: Facts, Offenses and the Logic of Loose Ends in Between

Rechtstheorie (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on crime.Charles P. Nemeth - 2008 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Grading Arson.Michael T. Cahill - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):79-95.
Relatively about: Loose composites and loose ends. [REVIEW]Joseph S. Ullian - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (1):83 - 100.
History’s Challenge to Criminal Law Theory.Darryl Brown - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (3):271-287.
Sheng ming xing fa yuan li.Junxin Kang - 2009 - Taibei Shi: Yuan zhao chu ban you xian gong si.
Conscience (rule) utilitarianism and the criminal law.R. B. Brandt - 1995 - Law and Philosophy 14 (1):65 - 89.
Jumping to Conclusions.Bart Verheij - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 411--423.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Community at Loose Ends.Miami Theory Collective (ed.) - 1991 - University of Minnesota Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-23

Downloads
3 (#1,712,040)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references