Comment on Dr. Foley’s Paper

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 26:140-146 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comment on Dr. Foley’s Paper.William Kane - 1952 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 26:140-146.
Foley's Self-Trust and Religious Disagreement.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (2):217-226.
Reply to Van Inwagen.Richard Foley - 1980 - Analysis 40 (March):101-103.
Comment on Father Gerard SmiIth’s Paper.William Kane - 1953 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 27:83-84.
Compatibilism: A reply to Richard Foley.Daniel J. Shaw - 1979 - Mind 88 (October):584-585.
Conceptual diversity in epistemology.Richard Foley - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 177--203.
The Abuse of the Hypocrisy Charge in Politics.Richard McDonough - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):287-307.
Comments on George Vick's Address.Merrill Ring - 1972 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 53 (3):357.
The Natural Law and International Relations. Foley, S. M. Foley & Natalie Lincoln - 1950 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 24:167-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
4 (#1,629,625)

6 months
1 (#1,478,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references