Response to commentary on “Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity”

Philosophical Studies:1-4 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response to a commentary on “Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity” considers whether a difference that would be morally relevant when choosing which of two people to save retains its relevance if this would affect other people’s chances of being saved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity.F. M. Kamm - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-17.
In search of clarity about parity. [REVIEW]Michael Wheeler - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (3):417 - 425.
Allocation of Scarce Resources.Paul Menzel - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie P. Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 305–322.
Priority, Ethical Principle, and Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources. Di Wu - 2021 - Studies in Dialectics of Nature 11 (37):62-68.
A theory of virtue: response to critics.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (1):159-165.
Nurse time as a scarce health care resource.Donna Dickenson - 1994 - In Geoffrey Hunt (ed.), Ethical issues in nursing. London: Routledge. pp. 207-217.
Feminism and Disability.Joel Michael Reynolds & Anita Silvers - 2017 - In Hay Carol (ed.), Philosophy: Feminism. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 295-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-27

Downloads
7 (#1,379,768)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Kamm
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references