Grouping and the Imposition of Loss: F. M. Kamm

Utilitas 10 (3):292-319 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this article, I critically examine Peter Unger's arguments for the claim that there is a duty to cause physical harm to oneself and others in order to save lives. This includes discussion of his view that when the method of cases involves several rather than merely two options our intuitive judgements support his radical thesis. In conclusion, I consider his attempt to reconcile his claims with common sense moral judgements.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.
Obligations of Nearness.Francesco Orsi - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):1-21.
Aggregation and two moral methods.F. M. Kamm - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (1):1-23.
Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War.F. M. Kamm (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
What Is Wrong With Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek.Tyler Doggett - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-16.
Partiality and Weighing Harm to Non-Combatants.David Lefkowitz - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (3):298-316.


Added to PP

90 (#138,193)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Myrna Kamm
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Virtues and Vices.Philippa Foot - 1983 - Noûs 17 (1):117-121.
Singer and His Critics.Brad Hooker - 2002 - Mind 111 (441):122-126.

Add more references