Transnationals and Corporate Responsibility: A Polythetic View of Moral Obligation

International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:1-16 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper proposes a model of transnational corporations that calls for a non-unitary normative approach to ground the kind of corporate social responsibility that must, maximally, be ascribed to them. This involves injecting the notion of moral obligation into the picture, a particularly strict notion with an equally rigorous set of requirements that is not normally expected to be applicable to the case of big business operating internationally. However, if we are to be honest about the prospects of establishing a viable regime of international justice in conditions of globalized economies, the litanies of half-measures, wishful thinking, and lame excuses for nottackling the responsibilities of multinationally operating economic units will obviously lead us nowhere. Neither will any lists of principles of a voluntary global compact type, nor the intuitions of business ethics writers, be of any help either. We must go back to the historical kernel of ethical systems, identify key concepts, and ascertain for which particular issues raised by the operation of transnationals each such concept best delivers the corresponding moral obligation, thus silencing the traditional realist worry that the international arena is, logically, a Hobbesian state of nature. My proposal rests on the idea that transnationals are polythetic organisms,both internally and externally, that require a corresponding multi-positioned ethical approach to cover their overlapping operating units.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
The Relevance of Responsibility to Ethical Business Decisions.Patrick E. Murphy - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S2):245 - 252.
Paternalism and corporate responsibility.David Crossley - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):291 - 302.
Normativity and reason.Thomas Pink - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):406-431.
Defining a post-conventional corporate moral responsibility.Elsa González - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):101 - 108.
Corporate moral responsibility in health care.Stephen Wilmot - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (2):139-146.
Management ethics.Norman E. Bowie - 2005 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Patricia Hogue Werhane.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
45 (#311,164)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Byron Kaldis
National Technical University of Athens

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references