How did viviparity originate and evolve? Of conflict, co‐option, and cryptic choice

Bioessays 37 (7):721-731 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose that the underlying adaptation enabling the reproductive strategy of birthing live young (viviparity) is retraction of the site of fertilization within the female reproductive tract, and that this evolved as a means of postcopulatory sexual selection. There are three conspicuous aspects associated with viviparity: (i) internal development is a complex trait often accompanied by a suite of secondary adaptations, yet it is unclear how the intermediate state of this trait – egg retention – could have evolved; (ii) viviparity often results in a reduction in fecundity; (iii) viviparity has evolved independently many times across a diverse array of animal groups. Focusing on the Diptera (true flies), I provide explanations for these observations. I further propose that fecundity is not traded‐off to enable potential benefits of viviparity, but rather that loss of fecundity is directly selected and egg retention is an indirect consequence – a model that provides a unifying common basis for the ubiquity of viviparity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Deception about Fecundity in Women.Philip H. Crowley - 2020 - Human Nature 31 (4):421-442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
15 (#950,671)

6 months
3 (#1,206,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?