Criticisms of the “container” model of pregnancy picturing female and embryo as separate entities multiply in various philosophical and scientific contexts during the last decades. In this paper, we examine how this model underlies received views of pregnancy in evolutionary biology, in the characterization of the transition from oviparity to viviparity in mammals and in the selectionist explanations of pregnancy as an evolutionary strategy. In contrast, recent evo-devo studies on eutherian reproduction, including the role of inflammation and new maternal cell types, gather evidence in favor of considering pregnancy as an evolved relational novelty. Our thesis is that from this perspective we can identify the emergence of a new historical individual in evolution. In evo-devo, historical units are conceptualized as evolved entities which fulfill two main criteria, their continuous persistence and their non-exchangeability. As pregnancy can be individuated in this way, we contend that pregnant females are historical individuals. We argue that historical individuality differs from, and coexists with, other views of biological individuality as applied to pregnancy, but brings forward an important new insight which might help dissolve misguided conceptions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572106
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Organisms, Agency, and Evolution.D. M. Walsh - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Were You a Part of Your Mother?Elselijn Kingma - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):609-646.
What Is Epistemic Public Trust in Science?Gürol Irzik & Faik Kurtulmus - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4):1145-1166.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Dual Role of Evo-Devo Mechanisms and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.Guillermo Folguera & Nicolás Lavagnino - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (2):251-275.
Not One, Not Two: Toward an Ontology of Pregnancy.Maja Sidzinska - 2017 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):1-23.
Pregnant Bodies, Pregnant Minds.Amy Mullin - 2002 - Feminist Theory 3 (1):27-44.
Evo-Devo: A Science of Dispositions.Christopher J. Austin - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):373-389.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #734,940 of 2,518,089 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,129 of 2,518,089 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes