The Future of Nietzsche's Perspectivism as Political Consensus

Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal 5 (2):58-74 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I delve on Nietzsche’s concept of perspectivism and how it becomes relevant amid contemporary society’s openness to relative standpoints. The foremost era that reflects this description points to postmodernism as a politics of difference. Nietzsche’s perspectivism is generally a critique of the conditions that absolutize truth. While this may seem a valiant opening for a welcoming era on an epistemological standpoint, it does not however do away with its own paradoxes. I contend whether this fits well with postmodernism and its ironic relationship to truth and asserts further that the conditions for Nietzsche’s perspectivism can only achieve its future if it hermeneutically stands as political consensus. Later, I will present the features of this perspectivism as political consensus and how it can be viable in postmodernity.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-27

Downloads
526 (#3,201)

6 months
403 (#51,454)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Gresil Kahambing
University of Macau

Citations of this work

The abyss, or the insufficiency of ethical nihilism for Nietzsche’s Übermensch.Jan Gresil Kahambing - 2020 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 10 (3-4):155-172.

Add more citations