Forfeited Health: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “What's Wrong With Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?”

American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):W1-W2 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 12, Page W1-W2, December 2011

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2011.623988

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What's Wrong With Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?Stewart Justman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):21-25.
A Rational Basis for Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer.Caroline J. Huang & Matthew L. Baum - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):27-29.
Good Ethics Begins With Sound Medicine: Prostate Cancer Screening and Chemoprevention.Ronald Ennis & Alan Jotkowitz - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):26-27.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Health Literacy, Health Inequality and a Just Health Care System".Angelo E. Volandes & Michael K. Paasche-Orlow - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):1-2.
Uninformed consent: Mass screening for prostate cancer.Stewart Justman - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (3):143-148.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Rationing Just Medical Care”.Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Concept of Voluntary Consent”.Robert M. Nelson & Tom L. Beauchamp - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):W1-W3.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Pitfalls of Deducing Ethics from Economics: Why the Association of American Medical Colleges is Wrong About Pharmaceutical Detailing”.Thomas S. Huddle - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Compelled Authorizations for Disclosure of Health Records: Magnitude and Implications".Mark Rothstein & Meghan Talbott - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Donation After Circulatory Death: Burying the Dead Donor Rule”.David Rodríguez-Arias, Maxwell J. Smith & Neil M. Lazar - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):W4-W6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”.Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):W3 - W5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Returning to History: The Ethics of Researching Asylum Seeker Health in Australia”.Deborah Zion, Linda Briskman & Bebe Loff - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (2):6-7.
Prostate Cancer Prevention: Do the 5-ARIs Make the Grade?Howard L. Parnes - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):30-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-07

Downloads
11 (#1,132,782)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Prostate Cancer Prevention: Do the 5-ARIs Make the Grade?Howard L. Parnes - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):30-31.

Add more references