Philosophical Topics 47 (1):105-123 (2019)

James Justus
Florida State University
Perhaps no concept has been thought more important to ecological theorizing than the niche. Without it, technically sophisticated and well-regarded accounts of character displacement, ecological equivalence, limiting similarity, and others would seemingly never have been developed. The niche is also widely considered the centerpiece of the best candidate for a distinctively ecological law, the competitive exclusion principle. But the incongruous array and imprecise character of proposed definitions of the concept square poorly with its apparent scientific centrality. I argue this definitional diversity and imprecision reflects a problematic conceptual indeterminacy that challenges its putative indispensability in ecology.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtopics20194716
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nisza.Achille C. Varzi & Barry Smith - 2000 - Filozofia Nauki 3:5–30.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #805,403 of 2,497,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,462 of 2,497,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes