Ships among ports: Futures of Europe

Futures (38):129-132 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The future is evitable. That is to say if, as many of the contributors to Futures over the years have claimed, there is more than one future possible, and that more than one will be experienced, then talking about ‘inevitability’ is simply wrong. And what a task it is to attempt to say anything warranted, but nevertheless fresh concerning the futures of Europe—especially in such a context as considering the plural conception of futures in the title of this publication! Immediately after the member states of the Union failed to agree the draft treaty on European Constitution at the Intergovernmental Conference ending on December 13, 2003, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung provided two full pages of political coverage under the rubric “After the Failure [or ‘running aground’] of Brussels— The EU in Crisis”, and on the front page reported “The EU at an Uncertain Future” [2]. Six months later, on the day after those same states agreed a Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, The Irish Times reported that Sweden still supported the EU, but not the Euro, and that EU Council President Bertie Ahearn, the Irish Prime Minister, thanked all those who helped with ‘a ship that has been safely docked today’ [5]. Ships are useful not when they remain in port, but rather when they move, so six months later, after nearly four decades of failed attempts, on December 17, 2004, Turkey was given the possibility of opening talks for accession to the European Union. From the European docks of Ireland, Germany, Sweden, and the UK, there are contributions in this special edition of Futures on “The Futures of Europe”. Even within the geographic limits of Europe, the ships come at different speeds, as represented by two authors from outside the Eurozone and four within. There are also contributions from a ship between ports in Italy and the USA and from a ship between Germany and Turkey. And there is something from that port across the ocean—the USA. What may be perhaps the most telling contribution to this volume, however, is the one that is not here. I had invited a colleague from Beijing to provide a prospective from China on the futures of Europe, and he had enthusiastically accepted.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Constitution.Kirk W. Junker - 2006 - Futures 38:224-233.
European Constitutionalism v. Reformed Constitution for Europe.Vaidotas A. Vaicaitis - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):69-83.
‘Europe’: What Kind of Idea?Catherine Lee & Robert Bideleux - 2009 - The European Legacy 14 (2):163-176.
Central Europe and the European identity.Attila Agh - 1989 - World Futures 26 (2):123-140.
The Integration of the European Union and the Changing Cultural Space of Europe: Xenophobia and Webs of Significance. [REVIEW]Laura Story Johnson - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (2):211-224.
Sovereignty renounced.M. Ye eno lu - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (4-5):459-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-23

Downloads
322 (#63,092)

6 months
47 (#90,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kirk W. Junker
University of Cologne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references