Schauer on Coercion, Acceptance, and Schizophrenia

Ratio Juris 29 (2):215-222 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a comment on The Force of Law, which is Schauer's new and illuminating contribution to the place of law in our societies and in our lives. It constitutes a strong defence of the importance of coercion in law. First, I consider cases where the law is not able to motivate human behaviour adequately, in order to show that legal coercion is not always justified. Second, I examine the Rawlsian distinction between the ideal and the nonideal theory and its application to the theory of law. Third, I tentatively argue that coercion has no place in ideal theory, but a core place in nonideal theory. In this way, it may be plausible to reconstruct the motivation to accept the law, at least when the law is normatively justified.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Coercion and the (Functions of) Law.Julieta A. Rabanos - forthcoming - In Nicoletta Bersier Ladavac, Christoph Bezemek & Frederick Schauer (eds.), Sanctions: An Essential Element of Law? Springer.
On Force, Effectiveness, and Law in Kelsen.Julieta A. Rabanos - forthcoming - In Gonzalo Villa Rozas, Jorge Emilio Núñez & Jorge L. Fabra-Zamora (eds.), Kelsenʼs Global Legacy. Essays on Legal and Political Philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Law and the Entitlement to Coerce.Robert C. Hughes - 2013 - In Wilfrid J. Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical foundations of the nature of law. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 183.
Would many people obey non-coercive law?Robert C. Hughes - 2018 - Jurisprudence 9 (2):361-367.
Law and Coercion: Some Clarification.Lucas Miotto - 2021 - Ratio Juris 34 (1):74-87.
Coercion.Grant Lamond - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 642–653.
Coercion and the nature of law.Grant Lamond - 2001 - Legal Theory 7 (1):35-57.
Can Rawls’s Nonideal Theory Save his Ideal Theory?Hye Ryoung Kang - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):32-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-23

Downloads
15 (#950,671)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jose Juan Moreso
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Citations of this work

A Reply to Five Friends.Frederick Schauer - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (3):348-363.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.

View all 16 references / Add more references