Sind and Science [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):367-367 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Writing in the tradition of Deweyan pragmatism, the author is critical of the transcendent in ethics, and explicitly accuses Niebuhr of making his political ethic a no-man's-land between an antiquarian view of human nature, and man's dependence upon an intrusion of grace at the end. Odegard raises important questions, but his treatment is superficial in many instances, and is directed from a position which is assumed, not defended.--J. E. B.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reinhold Niebuhr in Contemporary Scholarship: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]Robin Lovin - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (3):487 - 505.
Power and suspicion: The perspectives of Reinhold Niebuhr.John Patrick Diggins - 1992 - Ethics and International Affairs 6:141–161.
Tragedy and History in Reinhold Niebuhr's Thought.Khurram Hussain - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (2):147-159.
Reason and Emotion in the Ethics of Self‐Restraint.Daniel A. Morris - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):495-515.
The Political Theory of Reinhold Niebuhr.James V. Schall - 1958 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 33 (1):62-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
7 (#1,385,962)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references