Luther's Two Kingdoms Revisited: A Response to Reinhold Niebuhr's Criticism of Luther

Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):93 - 110 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A close reading of Luther's treatise on "Temporal Authority" and a review of the most pertinent Luther scholarship show why Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms remains notoriously difficult to interpret. Reinhold Niebuhr's criticism of Luther in "The Nature and Destiny of Man" is representative of widespread discontent with Luther's argument, but Niebuhr misses the soteriological point of Luther's distinction between the two kingdoms and the significance of salvation for life in society. Ironically, Niebuhr must cite Luther in such a way as to confuse the kingdoms in order to support his charge that Luther's position leads to "quietism" and "defeatism.".



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Luther on Paul.Timothy Stanley - 2007 - Dialog: A Journal of Theology 46 (1):41-45.
Martin Luther on the bondage of the will.Martin Luther - 1957 - [Westwood, N.J.]: Revell. Edited by J. I. Packer & O. R. Johnston.
The bondage of the will.Martin Luther - 1923 - London,: Sovereign grace union. Edited by Henry Cole, Edward Thomas Vaughan & Henry Atherton.
The political theories of Martin Luther.Luther Hess Waring - 1910 - Port Washington, N.Y.,: Kennikat Press.


Added to PP

31 (#501,295)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references