Splitting the Difference: Aesthetic Relations in Henry James and Leo Bersani

(2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As an alternative to psychoanalysis’s aggressive subject/object relation, Leo Bersani proposes a more modulated, aesthetic subjectivity. This essay explores Bersani’s concept of aesthetic relations through impressionism’s and realism’s competing demands on the artistic object in Henry James’s “Flickerbridge.” I suggest this 1902 short story can be productively read as a theory of the perspectival shift James was exploring in his experiments with literary impressionism in that period.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Seis consideraciones en favor de la estética natural.Roman de la Calle - 2006 - Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciència 36:85-92.
Aesthetic Experience and Value.Richard R. Mccarty - 1984 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Non-perceptual aesthetic properties: Comments for James Shelley.Noël Carroll - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.
The Literary Remains of the Late Henry James.Henry James - 2019 - James R. Osgood and Company.
Aesthetic Experts, Guides to Value.Dominic Mciver Lopes - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):235-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-09

Downloads
14 (#997,421)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references