Revelation and Reason in the Theology of Carl F. H. Henry, James I. Packer, and Ronald H. Nash

Dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this dissertation was to explore the thesis that the complementary proposals of Carl Henry, J. I. Packer, and Ronald Nash concerning the correspondence of revelation and reason provide a promising ground for objective theological knowledge. ;The first chapter surveyed the theological context in terms of the challenge of modernity, the response of theology, and the contribution of evangelical theology in the modern context. In addition, the current challenge of postmodernity and the contribution of evangelical theology in the postmodern context were briefly noted. ;Chapters two through four respectively considered the proposals of Carl Henry, J. I. Packer, and Ronald Nash concerning the correspondence of revelation and reason. Each chapter included a biographical profile and a preliminary critique. The analysis of Henry's proposal treated the concept of the Logos in Western philosophy and the Logos as the ground of an objective epistemology. The analysis of Packer's proposal considered the concept of revelation in modern theology and revelation as communication from God to humanity. The analysis of Nash's proposal considered epistemology and belief in God and the correspondence of revelation and reason. ;The final chapter synthesized the epistemological foundation of Carl Henry, J. I. Packer, and Ronald Nash in terms of the Logos and epistemology, the image of God in humanity, the objectivity of revelation, evangelical presuppositionalism, and the evangelical proposal in the postmodern context. The chapter then proposed a similar yet purely formal epistemological foundation in terms of points of affirmation of the evangelical proposal, the necessity of a purely formal foundation, the elements of the formal foundation, and the formal foundation in the postmodern context. The conclusion of the dissertation was that the complementary proposals of Carl Henry, J. I. Packer, and Ronald Nash concerning the correspondence of revelation and reason do provide a promising ground for objective theological knowledge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Truth in Contemporary American Evangelical Theology.James Emery White - 1991 - Dissertation, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
The word of God and the mind of man.Ronald H. Nash - 1982 - Phillipsburg, N.J.: P&R.
The Political Thought of Carl F. H. Henry.David Lee Weeks - 1991 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Aquinas and Continental Philosophy of Religion.Joseph G. Trabbic - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:211-228.
Reason and revelation: Kant and the problem of authority. [REVIEW]Phil Enns - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):103 - 114.
No one like Him: the doctrine of God.John S. Feinberg - 2006 - Wheaton. Ill.: Crossway Books.
History as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):293-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references