Limitations on the Neuroscientific Study of Mystical Experiences

Zygon 53 (4):992-1017 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuroscientific scanning of meditators is taken as providing data on mystical experiences. However, problems concerning how the brain and consciousness are related cast doubts on whether any understanding of the content of meditative experiences is gained through the study of the brain. Whether neuroscience can study the subjective aspects of meditative experiences in general is also discussed. So too, whether current neuroscience can establish that there are “pure consciousness events” in mysticism is open to question. The discussion points to limitations on neuroscience's capability to add to our understanding of the phenomenological content of mystical experiences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenological Intentionality meets an Ego-less State.Jenny Barnes - 2003 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 3 (1):1-17.
Altered States.David Fontana - 2017 - In Susan Schneider & Max Velmans (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 217–226.
Mystical ineffability: a nonconceptual theory.Sebastian Gäb - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-16.
Consciousness: An Introduction.Susan J. Blackmore - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Emily Troscianko.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-22

Downloads
69 (#242,732)

6 months
25 (#118,685)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?