Editing Out the Embryo

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):83-105 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two conferences on genome editing held in December 2015 offer a lens through which to contrast bioethics policies in the United Kingdom and the United States. The Progress Educational Trust, which has no parallel in the United States, hosted the London conference and illustrates the close collaboration between government departments, scientific bodies, funding organizations, and lobby groups in the United Kingdom. The rhetoric of responsible regulation used in the United Kingdom protects not the embryo, but the practice of embryo destruction, and advocates of embryo experimentation are eager to guide the debate about genome editing. It would be perilous for the international community to allow the United Kingdom to frame the debate in this way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Navigating an Impasse in the Embryo Adoption Debate.Charles Robertson - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (3):409-417.
Human Genome Editing.Kevin FitzGerald - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):107-122.
The Human Embryo as Person in Catholic Teaching.Norman Ford - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (2):155-160.
NBAC and Embryo Ethics.Renée Mirkes - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (2):163-187.
The Magisterial Liceity of Embryo Transfer.Elizabeth Bothamley Rex - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (4):701-722.
Ethical Attitudes and Behavior of Investment Professionals in the United Kingdom.H. Kent Baker & E. Theodore Veit - 1996 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 5 (1):87-117.
The Problem with the Problem of the Embryo.Bernard G. Prusak - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):503-521.
A Thomistic Analysis of Embryo Adoption.Charles Robertson - 2014 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14 (4):673-695.
Science, Ethos, and Transcendence in the Anatomy of Nicolaus Steno.Frank Sobiech - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):107-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
12 (#1,082,941)

6 months
4 (#783,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Albert Jones
Anscombe Bioethics Centre

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references