The Mind As a Scientific Object

Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What holds together the various fields, which - considered together - are supposed to constitute the general intellectual discipline that people now call cognitive science? Some theorists identify the common subject matter as the mind, but scientists have not been able to agree on any single, satisfactory answer to the question of what the mind is. This book argues that all cognitive sciences are not equal, and that rather only neurophysiology and cultural psychology are suited to account for the mind's ontology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review essay: The mind as a scientific object.Itay Shani - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):229-241.
The cognitive neuroscience laboratory: A framework for the science of mind.Itiel Dror & Robin Thomas - 2005 - In Christina E. Erneling & David Martel Johnson (eds.), Mind As a Scientific Object. Oxford University Press. pp. 283.
Can there be a cognitive neuroscience of central cognitive systems?Vinod Goel - 2005 - In Christina E. Erneling & David Martel Johnson (eds.), Mind As a Scientific Object. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-22

Downloads
4 (#1,642,915)

6 months
3 (#1,046,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references