- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Possibilities as the foundation of reasoning
Cognition 193 (C):103950 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Utility and deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-Laird and Byrne.K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over - 1992 - Cognition 43 (2):183-188.
Paralogical reasoning: Evans, Johnson-Laird, and Byrne on liar and truth-teller puzzles.Lance J. Rips - 1990 - Cognition 36 (3):291-314.
Dlaczego wnioskujemy niepoprawnie. Teoria modeli mentalnych P. N. Johnsona-Lairda.Krzysztof A. Wieczorek - 2007 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
Emotions, moods, and conscious awareness; comment on johnson-laird and oatley's “the language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field”.Andrew Ortony & Gerald L. Clore - 1989 - Cognition and Emotion 3 (2):125-137.
Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning.Gary L. Brase - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (4):722-728.
Children's reasoning in solving relational problems of deduction.Lyn D. English - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (3):249 – 281.
The real interpretations of ‘if’ in academic texts: A study of the possibilities corresponding to the conditional in a psychology paper.Miguel López-Astorga - 2020 - Aufklärung 7 (2).
Johnson, PE, 355 Johnson, TR, 903 Johnson-Laird, PN, 565 Kemeny, V., 733.W. Kintsch, P. Boyer, M. Bucciarelli, B. R. Buchsbaum, M. W. Burton, Y. D. Cheng, M. T. H. Chi, T. Clermont, L. Z. Daily & N. Dounskaia - 2001 - Cognitive Science 25:979-980.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-07-31
Downloads
45 (#549,249)
6 months
7 (#614,157)
2019-07-31
Downloads
45 (#549,249)
6 months
7 (#614,157)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Indirect illusory inferences from disjunction: a new bridge between deductive inference and representativeness.Mathias Sablé-Meyer & Salvador Mascarenhas - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (3):567-592.
Norm Conflicts and Epistemic Modals.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen & John Cantwell - 2023 - Cognitive Psychology 145 (101591):1-30.
Super Linguistics: an introduction.Pritty Patel-Grosz, Salvador Mascarenhas, Emmanuel Chemla & Philippe Schlenker - 2023 - Linguistics and Philosophy Super Linguistics Special Issue.
When nomenclature matters: Is the “new paradigm” really a new paradigm for the psychology of reasoning?Markus Knauff & Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 29 (3):341-370.
References found in this work
What 'must' and 'can' must and can mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce.Charles Sanders Peirce, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss - 1933 - International Journal of Ethics 43 (2):220-226.
Normality: Part Descriptive, part prescriptive.Adam Bear & Joshua Knobe - 2017 - Cognition 167 (C):25-37.
Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Patricia W. Cheng & Keith J. Holyoak - 1985 - Cognitive Psychology 17 (4):391-416.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo