“No such thing” - a response to James Franklin

Abstract

In December’s Quadrant James Franklin asked “Is Jensenism compatible with Christianity?” and claimed of Sydney Anglicans that they “fear the gospels, for the gospel message is inconvenient”. This brand of “narrow” “Bible-based” Christianity pits Paul against Jesus, he says; engages in selective reading of the Bible; and creates “an inwardlooking and recent sect.”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Corrupting the youth: A history of philosophy in australia.Frank Jackson - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):652 – 653.
True story Bible study: five studies for individuals or groups.James Choung - 2022 - Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP, an imprint of InterVarsity Press.
Paul, Theologian of God's Apocalypse.Martinus C. De Boer - 2002 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 56 (1):21-33.
Jesus' Entry into Jerusalem.Juho Sankamo - 2014 - Approaching Religion 4 (2):25-36.
James as the First Catholic Epistle.John Painter - 2006 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 60 (3):245-259.
Christianity.Robin Attfield - 2001 - In Dale Jamieson (ed.), A Companion to Environmental Philosophy. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell. pp. 96–110.
'And Abraham believed'. Paul, James, and the Gentiles.Magnus Zetterholm - 2003 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 24 (1-2):109-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
16 (#934,417)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references