Empedocles’ on nature frr. B 8–9 in the context of plutarch's against colotes

Classical Quarterly 67 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Epicurean Colotes, in a work entitled Περὶ τοῦ ὅτι κατὰ τὰ τῶν ἄλλων φιλοσόφων οὐδὲ ζῆν ἔστιν, cited two fragments of Empedocles in order to prove that the poet denied that existence exists. Both are prominent in controversies about Empedocles’ physics and his usage of the term φύσις, but fr. 9 is very corrupt. To have any hope of restoring it, we will need to examine carefully Plutarch's explication de texte in his Adversus Colotem. Although there have been two detailed treatments of this passage, neither has resolved the difficulties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-05

Downloads
24 (#678,213)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Chapter Six.Alexander P. D. Mourelatos - 1986 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 2 (1):127-194.
Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue grecque.James W. Poultney & Pierre Chantraine - 1981 - American Journal of Philology 102 (2):239.
Hermarchus, Against Empedocles.Dirk Obbink - 1988 - Classical Quarterly 38 (02):428-.
Empedocles' fragments 8, 9, 10 DK.N. Van Der Ben - 1978 - Phronesis 23 (3):197-215.

Add more references