COI Stories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science

Perspectives on Science 10 (4):457-522 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. This paper takes as its point of departure two striking incongruities between scientific practice and trends in modern history and philosophy of science. Many modern historians of science are so preoccupied with local scientific practices that they fail to recognize important non-local elements. Many modern philosophers of science make a sharp distinction between explanation and evidence, whereas in scientific practice explanatory power is routinely used as evidence for scientific claims. I draw attention to one specific way in.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-22

Downloads
11 (#1,135,140)

6 months
7 (#425,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michel Janssen
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

A material theory of induction.John D. Norton - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity.Michel Janssen - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (1):26-52.
The Non-equivalence of Einstein and Lorentz.Clara Bradley - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1039-1059.
On the Evidential Import of Unification.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (1):92-114.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations