Van Fraassen's Critique Of Inference To The Best Explanation

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):691-710 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inference to the best explanation made coherent.Igor Douven - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (Supplement):S424-S435.
Explanation and the theory of questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
Inference to the best explanation: Van Fraassen and the case of the 'fifth force'.Marin Marinov - 1988 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (1):35 – 50.
The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology.Derek Turner - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (1):193-212.
Reactionary responses to the Bad Lot Objection.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:32-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
316 (#61,565)

6 months
31 (#102,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samir Okasha
University of Bristol

References found in this work

The inference to the best explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
Conditionalization and observation.Paul Teller - 1973 - Synthese 26 (2):218-258.
Problems of Old Evidence†.Ellery Eells - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (3-4):283-302.
Some problems for bayesian confirmation theory.Charles S. Chihara - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):551-560.

View all 8 references / Add more references