- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Some further thoughts on “thought crimes”
Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):61-63 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Crimes of Negligence: Attempting and Succeeding. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):387-398.
Harman on self referential thoughts.Christopher S. Hill - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):346-357.
Crimes of action, crimes of thought : Arendt on reconciliation, forgiveness, and judgment.Shai Lavi - 2010 - In Roger Berkowitz (ed.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 229-236.
Nowhere to run? Punishing war crimes.Michael Clark & Peter Cave - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (2):197-207.
Are Hate Crimes Conceptually Distinct From Other Crimes?George Schedler - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):189-195.
Indexical Thought.David Pitt - 2013 - In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), Phenomenal Intentionality. Oxford University Press. pp. 49-70.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
32 (#499,655)
6 months
6 (#520,848)
2010-08-24
Downloads
32 (#499,655)
6 months
6 (#520,848)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Motive, Action, and Confusions in the Debate over Hate Crime Legislation.Stephen Mathis - 2018 - Criminal Justice Ethics 37 (1):1-20.
References found in this work
First amendment challenges to hate crime legislation: Where's the speech?James Weinstein - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):6-20.
“Brother, you can't go to jail for what you're thinking”: Motives, effects, and “hate crime” laws.Susan Gellman - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):24-29.
The ADL hate crime statute and the first amendment.Larry Alexander - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):49-51.
Freedom of thought as freedom of expression: Hate crime sentencing enhancement and first amendment theory.Martin H. Redish - 1992 - Criminal Justice Ethics 11 (2):29-42.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo