Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics, by Mark G. Kuczewski. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997. 177 pp [Book Review]

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):246-249 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the level of theoretical foundations, contemporary bioethics is to a large extent Balkanized. Without difficulty, one can find contributions from communitarians, consequentialists, and feminists, as well as those who advocate an and The problem is not so much the wide diversity of views as the lack of agreement over the basics of medical ethics. For that reason alone, any attempt to find some harmony among these many diverse voices is a welcome addition to the literature. FragmentationandConsensus is such an attempt. Kuczewski argues that both communitarianism and casuistry can be understood as neo-Aristotelian approaches to ethics, and that once these views are communitarianism and casuistry are found to be highly complementary. In the process of constructing his theory, Kuczewski also finds room for liberal political theory and narrative ethics. The resulting amalgam is interesting, and the project ambitious

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics.G. Rawlings - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):356-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
38 (#417,623)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references