In Defense of the Crown Act

Philosophia 51 (4):1977-1992 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The CROWN Act is a recent piece of legislation adopted in 19 states and a handful of counties that prohibits race-based hair discrimination, which is the denial of employment and educational opportunities from individuals with kinky or curly hair textures or associated hairstyles. I contend, however, that in spite of the political and popular momentum, politician and activists need stronger and more compelling arguments in order to attain broader legislative support. I will provide some of these supporting arguments here, asserting that the CROWN Act represents a profound legal, political, and moral advancement in our understanding of discrimination generally, and American racism in particular. Importantly, in amending the definition of “race” to include some mutable characteristics, the CROWN Act clarifies what counts as evidence of racial discrimination.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of counterfactuals.Sara Worley - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):311-325.
Issues in evolutionary epistemology.Raphael Falk - 1994 - Philosophia 23 (1-4):333-343.
Aspects of language.H. Schnelle - 1973 - Philosophia 3 (2-3):295-341.
The dynamics of deictic thoughts.Jérôme Dokic - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (2):179 - 204.
Error in action and belief.Natika Newton - 1989 - Philosophia 19 (4):363-401.
Empirical significance and relevance.Marcelo Pascal - 1971 - Philosophia 1 (1-2):81-106.
Criteria, meaning and justification.Alan H. Goldman - 1981 - Philosophia 9 (3-4):281-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-09

Downloads
8 (#1,318,021)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations