Toward a Neoaristotelian Inherence Philosophy of Mathematical Entities

Studia Neoaristotelica 11 (2):159-204 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The fundamental idea of a Neoaristotelian inherence ontology of mathematical entities parallels that of an Aristotelian approach to the ontology of universals. It is proposed that mathematical objects are nominalizations especially of dimensional and related structural properties that inhere as formal species and hence as secondary substances of Aristotelian primary substances in the actual world of existent physical spatiotemporal entities. The approach makes it straightforward to understand the distinction between pure and applied mathematics, and the otherwise enigmatic success of applied mathematics in the natural sciences. It also raises an interesting set of challenges for conventional mathematics, and in particular for the ontic status of infinity, infinite sets and series, infinitesimals, and transfinite cardinalities. The final arbiter of all such questions on an Aristotelian inherentist account of the nature of mathematical entities are the requirements of practicing scientists for infinitary versus strictly finite mathematics in describing, explaining, predicting and retrodicting physical spatiotemporal phenomena. Following Quine, we classify all mathematics that falls outside of this sphere of applied scientific need as belonging to pure, and, with no prejudice or downplaying of its importance, ‘recreational’, mathematics. We consider a number of important problems in the philosophy of mathematics, and indicate how a Neoaristotelian inherence metaphysics of mathematical entities provides a plausible answer to Benacerraf’s metaphilosophical dilemma, pitting the semantics of mathematical truth conditions against the epistemic possibilities for justifying an abstract realist ontology of mathematical entities and truth conditions



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,869

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Applied Mathematics in the Sciences.Dale Jacquette - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):29--57.
Indispensability argument and anti-realism in philosophy of mathematics.Feng Ye - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):614-628.
Is platonism a bad bet?Mark Colyvan - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):115 – 119.
Problems with profligate platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):164-177.
Platonism and the 'Epistemic Role Puzzle'.Mark McEvoy - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):289-304.
Mathematical Entities.Lieven Decock - 2010 - In Robrecht Vanderbeeken & Bart D'Hooghe (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us. World Scientific. pp. 224-241.
Motivations for Realism in the Light of Mathematical Practice.Jessica Carter - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):17-29.
Getting in touch with numbers: Intuition and mathematical platonism.Colin Cheyne - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):111-125.
A new interpretation of the indispensability argument.Seahwa Kim - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):189 - 201.
Ontology and mathematical truth.Michael Jubien - 1977 - Noûs 11 (2):133-150.
Indispensability and Holism.Jacob Busch - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):47-59.


Added to PP

39 (#306,274)

6 months
4 (#200,315)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?