- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Economic Humility: A Response to Beckerman
Environmental Values 4 (1):57 - 68 (1995)
Abstract
The 'Discussion' section of this issue contains the following responses to Wilfred Beckerman's article 'Sustainable Development: Is it a Useful Concept?' Environmental Values 3,3 (1994): 191-209. Herman Daly, 'On Wilfred Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Development'; Michael Jacobs, 'Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Humility: A Response to Beckerman'; and Henryk Skolimowski, 'In Defence of Sustainable Development'. These criticisms are answered by Beckerman in Environmental Values 4,2.My notes
Similar books and articles
Discussion of Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Developemnt.Herman Daly, Michael Jacobs & Henryk Skolimowski - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (1):49-70.
On Wilfred Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Development.Herman E. Daly - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (1):49 - 55.
Discussion of Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Developemnt.Herman Daly, Michael Jacobs & Henryk Skolimowski - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (1):49-70.
In Defence of Sustainable Development.Henryk Skolimowski - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (1):69 - 70.
Capital Substitutability and Weak Sustainability Revisited: The Conditions for Capital Substitution in the Presence of Risk.Frank Figge - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (2):185 - 201.
How Would you Like your 'Sustainability', Sir? Weak or Strong? A Reply to my Critics.Wilfred Beckerman - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (2):169 - 179.
In Defence of Weak Sustainability: a Response to Beckerman.Salah El Serafy - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (1):75 - 81.
Sustainability and the Humanities.Adriana Consorte McCrea & Walter Leal Filho (eds.) - 2019 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Beckerman and his Critics on Strong and Weak Sustainability: Confusing Concepts and Conditions.M. S. Common - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (1):83 - 88.
The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development.Edward B. Barbier - 1987 - Environmental Conservation 14 (2):101-110.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-09-29
Downloads
15 (#947,122)
6 months
3 (#1,207,367)
2013-09-29
Downloads
15 (#947,122)
6 months
3 (#1,207,367)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Three Decades of Environmental Values: Some Personal Reflections.Clive L. Spash - 2022 - Environmental Values 31 (1):1-14.
On the Concept and Conservation of Critical Natural Capital.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (N/A):1-22.
What Does 'Natural Capital' Do? The Role of Metaphor in Economic Understanding of the Environment.Maria Åkerman - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (4):431-448.
Beckerman and his Critics on Strong and Weak Sustainability: Confusing Concepts and Conditions.M. S. Common - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (1):83 - 88.
References found in this work
'Sustainable Development': Is it a Useful Concept?Wilfred Beckerman - 1994 - Environmental Values 3 (3):191 - 209.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo