Authors |
|
Abstract |
In 2016, a multidisciplinary body of scholars within the International Commission on Stratigraphy—the Anthropocene Working Group—recommended that the world officially recognize the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch. The most contested claim about the Anthropocene, that humans are a major geological and environmental force on par with natural forces, has proven to be a hotbed for discussion well beyond the science of geology. One reason for this is that it compels many natural and social scientists to confront problems and systems that transgress traditional disciplinary boundaries, and as a result, calls for interdisciplinary research are now gaining traction. Proponents of such transgressions have dubbed the new scientific order that will result “Anthropocene Science”, and rhetoric notwithstanding, such discussions exemplify how recent changes within science justify rethinking a prevailing image of how science is done, and with it, the working relationship between scholars in the humanities, natural scientists, and social scientists.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.003 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
When Ecology Needs Economics and Economics Needs Ecology: Interdisciplinary Exchange During the Anthropocene.S. Andrew Inkpen & C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (2):203-221.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking Anthropos in the Anthropocene.Charles Brown - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (1):31-38.
The Natural History of Aesthetics.Thomas H. Ford - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (2):220-239.
Visualizing the Anthropocene Dialectically: Jessica Woodworth and Peter Brosens’ Eco-Crisis Trilogy.Angelos Koutsourakis - 2017 - Film-Philosophy 21 (3):299-325.
Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Neimanis, Åsberg & Hedrén - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):67-97.
Environmental Humanities: Voices From the Anthropocene.Serpil Oppermann & Serenella Iovino (eds.) - 2016 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
Saving Earth: Encountering Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology in the Anthropocene.Jochem Zwier & Vincent Blok - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):222-242.
Rebranding the Anthropocene.Langdon Winner - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):282-294.
Restoration and History in a Changing World: A Case Study in Ethics for the Anthropocene. Hourdequin - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (2):115-134.
Dwelling in the Anthropocene: Reimagining University Learning Environments in Response to Social and Ecological Change.David Rousell - unknown
Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on ‘Anthropocentric’ Law and Anthropocene ‘Humanity’.Anna Grear - 2015 - Law and Critique 26 (3):225-249.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-01-19
Total views
182 ( #65,527 of 2,519,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #33,781 of 2,519,844 )
2019-01-19
Total views
182 ( #65,527 of 2,519,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #33,781 of 2,519,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads