An Aesthetic Deontology: Accessible Beauty as a Fundamental Obligation of Architecture

Architecture Philosophy 2 (1):63-82 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argued for the obligation of architects to make buildings buildings that people will find 'beautiful'. Whilst an obligation to accessible beauty is universal to humanity, its satsfaction can be local for a ny culture. Four objections to the thesis are discussed, but the conclusion is that, amongst the several moral obligations architects are faced with, that to provide accessible beauty is a fundamental obligation

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-28

Downloads
103 (#167,540)

6 months
86 (#66,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Illies
Oxford University (DPhil)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.
Towards a reasonable objectivism for aesthetic judgements.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):163-177.

Add more references