Authors
Vlad Ile
Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj
Abstract
Albert’s anthropology places the human being at the top of a hierarchy of living things in virtue of a unique feature – namely the intellect – that offers the possibility of transcending the changing realm of nature and of assimilating its possessor to their divine creator. Even though Albert, throughout his works, often defends the independence of the human intellect from matter and consequently from the body and senses, his works on natural philosophy seem to offer a different perspective. In De animalibus, Albert considers the brain to be the divine member of the body responsible for the operations of sensation and, to a certain degree, of intellection. Thus, the entire humoral activity of the human body has a direct influence on the activity of the intellect, his divine nature notwithstanding. Accordingly, the main purpose of the present study is to point out how the classical humoral theory is integrated by Albert the Great in his physiological consideration for an explanation of the intellect placed between the murky boundaries of natural philosophy and metaphysics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/bpjam.00058.ile
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Albertus Magnus and the Sciences. Commemorative Essays 1980.J. Weisheipl - 1983 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (3):486-487.
Logic, Language, and Albert the Great.Richard F. Washell - 1973 - Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (3):445.
Entwicklung und stellung der intellekttheorie im system des Albertus Magnus.Henryk Anzulewicz - 2003 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 70 (1):165-218.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mirum Est Si Intellectus Noster Omnem Scientiam Accipiens Ex Phantasmate.Ile Vlad - 2021 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 23.
Albert the Great on Whether Natural Philosophy Proves God’s Existence.David B. Twetten - 1997 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 64:7-58.
Albert the Great Between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms.Luis Xavier López-Farjeat - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:89-102.
Albert the Great Between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms.Luis Xavier López-Farjeat - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:89-102.
Botany as Science and Exegetical Tool in Albert the Great.Amalia Cerrito - 2018 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 11 (1):97-107.
The Theory of Intellectual Construction in Theodoric of Freiberg.Burkhard Mojsisch - 1997 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 1 (1):69-79.
The Theory of Intellectual Construction in Theodoric of Freiberg.Burkhard Mojsisch - 1997 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 2 (1):69-79.
Mente e conoscenza di Dio in Alberto Magno.Anna Rodolfi - 2018 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 11 (1):121-132.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-09

Total views
3 ( #1,352,176 of 2,498,023 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,501 of 2,498,023 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes