Diderot’s Monsters, between Physiology and Politics

Philosophy Today 60 (1):125-138 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The monstrous power of the blind in Diderot’s 1949 Letter is not due to its ability to make people laugh or afraid, as its most common etymology would indicate: monstrum, monstrare, to point to an abnormal fact. The monstrous power of Diderot’s monster is that of one who shows: monere, monitor, in the manner of a guide or pathfinder. It shows us that everything that lives, and especially the human being, is a hybrid. It takes the idea of a possible mixture of animals and humans into account, thus the boldness of an ‘anti-speciesism’ as presented in the fantastical bestiary of Alembert’s Dream. It brings the humanism of essence to an end and invites us to redefine a new social bond.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Diderot et la question de la forme.Annie Ibrahim (ed.) - 1999 - Paris: Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
Diderot's Politics.Norman Suckling - 1973 - Diderot Studies 16:275 - 293.
Diderot e il polype d’eau douce: l’immaginazione tra natura e metafora.Matteo Marcheschi - 2014 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 7 (2):109-125.
Diderot's politics.Anthony Strugnell - 1973 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.
Order and chance: the pattern of Diderot's thought.Geoffrey Bremner - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
14 (#985,798)

6 months
2 (#1,186,462)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Monstrosity of Philosophy.Igor E. Klyuakanov - 2019 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (8):98-121.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references