The Monstrosity of Philosophy

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (8):98-121 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is a response to the calls for a comprehensive understanding of the nature of monstrosity, that is, those phenomena that are not amenable to empirical observation but are increasingly attracting scholarly interest. It is shown how the monster can be conceptualized as an object of culture of human imagination, i.e., in the form of works created by a culture in order to constitute its own identity, as well as in terms of behavior and practical actions through which they appear and can be discussed from a moral point of view. Admitting the importance of understanding of monstrosity within the humanities and social sciences, it is necessary to note a connection of this phenomenon with philosophy as something constantly emerging and associated with liminal zones. The author considers designations that are often used as synonyms for monstrosity and determines its specific nature. The article postulates that philosophy tries to conceptualize how a person is attracted by the world with its monstrosity, which is not just a component of being but its inherent nature. Moreover, as it deals with monstrosity, philosophy itself acquires a monstrous nature; in this sense, it cannot not be a creative activity of a universal character. In conclusion, it is stated that the philosophical understanding of monstrosity is critically important, since philosophy postulates foundations that are always monstrous in one way or another. It is also noted that the natural-scientific origins of the study of monstrosity have a philosophical orientation, since they address the fundamental question - “What is life?” Thus, monstrosity requires constant philosophical reflection on the human nature and life in general, whose boundaries are unstable and elusive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Monstrosity and the Limits of the Intellect: Philosophy as Teratomachy in Descartes.Filippo Del Luchesse - 2011 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 19 (1):107-134.
Foucault and the Enigma of the Monster.Luciano Nuzzo - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):55-72.
Lady Gaga as (dis)simulacrum of monstrosity.George Rossolatos - 2015 - Celebrity Studies 6 (2):231-246.
Vivre contre un mur.Laurent Bove - 2008 - Multitudes 33 (2):111.
Taming Augustine’s Monstrosity.Theresa Weynand Tobin - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:345-363.
Taming Augustine’s Monstrosity.Theresa Weynand Tobin - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:345-363.
Spontaneity and Monstrosity in Aristotle.Gordon H. Clark - 1934 - New Scholasticism 8 (1):31-45.
The Promise of Monsters.Amit S. Rai - 2005 - International Studies in Philosophy 37 (2):81-93.
Lucretius and Monsters.Vittorio Morfino - 2016 - Philosophy Today 60 (1):139-151.
On a New Philosophical Anthropology. [REVIEW]James Stanescu - 2010 - Radical Philosophy Review 13 (1):85-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-09

Downloads
7 (#1,201,537)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Points...: interviews, 1974-1994.Jacques Derrida - 1995 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Elisabeth Weber.
Proofs and Refutations.Imre Lakatos - 1980 - Noûs 14 (3):474-478.
Points...: Interviews, 1974-1994.Jacques Derrida - 1994 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Elisabeth Weber.

View all 10 references / Add more references