The Briggsian Heresy? Should Previously Expressed Wishes Determine Best Interests in Decisions Relating to Withdrawal of Clinically-Assisted Nutrition and Hydration?

The New Bioethics 26 (3):238-252 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the Court of Protection decision in Briggs v Briggs. It considers whether the approach of the Court, which gave effective decisive weight to a patient’s previously expressed wis...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality of life and assisted nutrition.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2008 - In C. Tollefsen (ed.), Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. Springer Press. pp. 103--110.
A Defense of Assisted Nutrition and Hydration in Patients with Dementia.John S. Howland - 2009 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 9 (4):697-710.
Proxy consent and counterfactual wishes.Edward Wierenga - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):405-416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-24

Downloads
6 (#1,461,169)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?