Note on contraries and subcontraries

Noûs 37 (4):690–705 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The semantic characterization of the (syllogistic) relations of contrariety and subcontrariety is problematic, as the present discussion illustrates here by attending to some suggestions of D. H. Sanford.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A relational syllogistic.Marek Nasieniewski - 2004 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 13:139-145.
Pleasure and Its Contraries.Olivier Massin - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):15-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)

6 months
59 (#85,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lloyd Humberstone
Monash University

References found in this work

Defining 'intrinsic'.Rae Langton & David Lewis - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):333-345.
Extrinsic properties.David Lewis - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (2):197-200.
Intrinsic/extrinsic.I. L. Humberstone - 1996 - Synthese 108 (2):205-267.
'Strong' and 'global' supervenience revisited.Jaegwon Kim - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (December):315-26.
Questions about quantifiers.Johan van Benthem - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):443-466.

View all 14 references / Add more references